Spooks Forum
Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - Printable Version

+- Spooks Forum (http://www.spooksforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: MI5 Operations (/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Series 9 (/forum-29.html)
+--- Thread: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc (/thread-1170.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - A Cousin - 05-11-2010 07:31 PM

(05-11-2010 07:29 PM)Tea Lady Wrote:  
(05-11-2010 06:12 PM)A Cousin Wrote:  Watch With Mothers at it again!

http://watchwithmothers.net/2010/11/05/spooks-series-9-episode-7/

Thanks for that. I love these.. "brooding eyebrows!"

My favorite this installment: "doe-eyed two-dimensional plot device." *snort!*

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - BravoNine - 05-11-2010 07:36 PM

(05-11-2010 07:31 PM)A Cousin Wrote:  
(05-11-2010 07:29 PM)Tea Lady Wrote:  
(05-11-2010 06:12 PM)A Cousin Wrote:  Watch With Mothers at it again!

http://watchwithmothers.net/2010/11/05/spooks-series-9-episode-7/

Thanks for that. I love these.. "brooding eyebrows!"

My favorite this installment: "doe-eyed two-dimensional plot device." *snort!*

My fav too!

*chuckles* Doe eyed? More like squirrel-meets-incoming-traffic eyed!!!Silba

Not anything against the actress, but must Maya carry the look of a frightened squirrel at all times? Dodgy

Maya running around with Lucas despite the obvious sketchy moments reminds me of this squirrel I nearly ran over with my bike while biking down the road. This squirrel sprints out of nowhere, so I stop to let it pass, but it decides to stop and stare at me for about 5 minutes before scampering away. It's just like Maya who sees the obvious train wreck but still decides to stand exactly where she is. Tell me her intelligence is not about the size of an acorn? Wait, that may actually be an insult to acorns everywhere.....

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - watchstrap - 06-11-2010 11:15 PM

I have posted this in the Speculation thread, but thought it worth a mention here. I sneaked a look at the Mother-in-law's Daily Mail TV listing mag today and saw something interesting. I cannot quote exactly as I didn't take up her offer of taking the mag home (even I have standards!!). But according to them, this season the cliffhanger is unlike previous ones, in that nothing is left as ambigious (then it repeats the words 'nothing'). One to ponder!

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - Tea Lady - 08-11-2010 04:11 PM

The BARB figures for episode 6 are out. Spooks got 6.36 million viewers. Much better than originally reported. In contrast BARB reports Whitechapel having figures of only 5.74 million that week. Quite a big victory for Spooks.

http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammesOverview?

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - HellsBells - 08-11-2010 04:15 PM

Yes ! Well done Spooks. I guess that's some justification for the storyline.

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - nothingisasitseems - 08-11-2010 04:30 PM

(08-11-2010 04:11 PM)Tea Lady Wrote:  The BARB figures for episode 6 are out. Spooks got 6.36 million viewers. Much better than originally reported. In contrast BARB reports Whitechapel having figures of only 5.74 million that week. Quite a big victory for Spooks.

http://www.barb.co.uk/report/weeklyTopProgrammesOverview?

hi Tea Lady,

Do you know why the figures for BARB are always way in excess of those reported the next day?

If these are "official" then it's probably pointless looking at the overnights.

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - Tea Lady - 08-11-2010 04:44 PM

(02-11-2010 02:34 PM)HellsBells Wrote:  I think Digital spy use data also supplied by BARB, but these are overnight viewing figures, literally what their 'panel' watched last night. But BARB also record when programmes are watched within 24 hours on recorded media and when the programme is watched within 7 days of broadcast on the TV via 'watch on demand' thingies. Therefore the figure goes up when they collate all the data. They don't seem the measure TV watched via the web, as they have devices attached to TVs in peoples houses.
At least that what I think, I could be completely wrong.

I don't, but I know someone who seems to have an idea...Wink

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - A Cousin - 08-11-2010 04:57 PM

(08-11-2010 04:44 PM)Tea Lady Wrote:  
(02-11-2010 02:34 PM)HellsBells Wrote:  I think Digital spy use data also supplied by BARB, but these are overnight viewing figures, literally what their 'panel' watched last night. But BARB also record when programmes are watched within 24 hours on recorded media and when the programme is watched within 7 days of broadcast on the TV via 'watch on demand' thingies. Therefore the figure goes up when they collate all the data. They don't seem the measure TV watched via the web, as they have devices attached to TVs in peoples houses.
At least that what I think, I could be completely wrong.

I don't, but I know someone who seems to have an idea...Wink

HellsBells, has it. More info on the process is on the BARB website FAQ's.

http://www.barb.co.uk/about/faq?_s=4

I find this kind of stuff fascinating, but I am weird that way.....Blush

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - Aria - 08-11-2010 10:49 PM

The last Guardian blog by Vicky Frost for season 9 Sad

http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/tvandradioblog/2010/nov/08/spooks-finale-episode-eight

RE: Series 9 Newspaper Reviews / Viewing figures etc - Tea Lady - 08-11-2010 11:00 PM

(08-11-2010 10:49 PM)Aria Wrote:  The last Guardian blog by Vicky Frost for season 9 Sad

http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/tvandradioblog/2010/nov/08/spooks-finale-episode-eight

I quite liked the Harry talk over bit, at the start. Something different.