+- Spooks Forum (http://www.spooksforum.co.uk)
+-- Forum: MI5 Operations (/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Character & Actor Discussion (/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 (/thread-1381.html)
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - Lizziecaro - 27-11-2010 01:38 PM
Re: The Rover - just in case you are unfamiliar with the title. It's a bawdy Restoration comedy (1677) by a female writer, Aphra Behn. Very fast paced and funny!
I'm afraid I got a bit over excited when i heard the news. I don't think it will be produced until the summer at the earliest, as most large theatres have their programmes organised up until June/ July. Also it will depend how much time RA has available as to whether it will take place in a number of venues of remain in one, eg the Old Vic. It will be great to see RA playing something raunchy, funny and completely unlike Lucas/John.
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - HellsBells - 27-11-2010 07:18 PM
This sounds very interesting as RA did say he wanted to do more comedy.
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - BoHenley - 27-11-2010 10:06 PM
(27-11-2010 01:38 PM)Lizziecaro Wrote: Re: The Rover - just in case you are unfamiliar with the title. It's a bawdy Restoration comedy (1677) by a female writer, Aphra Behn. Very fast paced and funny!
I'm afraid I got a bit over excited when i heard the news. I don't think it will be produced until the summer at the earliest, as most large theatres have their programmes organised up until June/ July. Also it will depend how much time RA has available as to whether it will take place in a number of venues of remain in one, eg the Old Vic. It will be great to see RA playing something raunchy, funny and completely unlike Lucas/John.
It sounds terrific. Wish I was over there to see it. Do you have a idea of the plot/story (if there is one?
)I also wonder how it's going to fit in with his Hobbit commitments. I'd imagine Sir Peter Jackson & Co. will take a while to set up, so maybe it might be earlier than the summer. Then again, they might do some scenes early to avoid the New Zealand (wet) winter (in your summer months). Keep us posted!
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - Lizziecaro - 28-11-2010 04:13 PM
There is a version of the play on Project Gutenberg and also on the E-drama website: http://drama.eserver.org/plays/17th_century/rover/index_html/.
There is also a synopsis of the play on the Wikipedia.
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - BoHenley - 29-11-2010 09:31 AM
Thanks, should've thought of that first.
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - Byatil - 15-12-2010 02:00 AM
I don't know if this article was mentioned in the previous thread, but I just came across it and thought it was rather interesting
http://www.tv.com/10-minutes-with-strike-backs-richard-armitage/story/22721.htmlI've been watching "Strike Back", where RA plays the leading-role. An excellent drama; but I was rather surprised at the similarities between his character John Portman, and his portrayal of Lucas North in Spooks. I was also intrigued to see him doing another water-boarding scene (which looks a fair bit more intense than the Spooks version!), especially after reading that he apparently has a fear of water?!
Anyway, I liked the mention of him hoping to appear in a "Crime and Punishment" or "Richard III" series one day. Those would definitely be brilliant shows to watch
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - HellsBells - 15-12-2010 12:06 PM
Thanks for the link Byatil.
I thought it was incredible that RA got water-boarded again!! Brave man to go through it a second time. I loved Strike Back, although it didn't follow the book that closely which I was quite surprised by.
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - Byatil - 15-12-2010 05:48 PM
Hmm, I've never heard of the book. Would you recommend reading it?
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - BoHenley - 15-12-2010 11:08 PM
Watch the DVD. The book is okay, and is certainly exciting at the end, but it drags at the beginning when he's an alcoholic and destitute. He could've summarised this in one paragraph. The DVD has the added bonus of RA, who is strangely shirtless in many scenes (I just had to keep watching these to check that Parental Guidance classification was adequate. I'll forget to mention that I don't have kids. HAHAHA!)
RE: [spoilers] Richard Armitage 2.0 - HellsBells - 16-12-2010 12:42 PM
The book 'Strike Back' is great, but then I have a tendency to read these action books. It is very similar in style to Andy McNab's books (ex SAS guy), so perhaps not every one's choice. It has a completely different ending (which I personally prefer) and really only deals with the first story of Sky's Strike Back, the other two are not part of the book.
(15-12-2010 11:08 PM)BoHenley Wrote: The DVD has the added bonus of RA, who is strangely shirtless in many scenes (I just had to keep watching these to check that Parental Guidance classification was adequate. I'll forget to mention that I don't have kids. HAHAHA!)
That is definitely an advantage over the book!! I have to admit I only bought the DVD because RA was in it.