| Poll: Harry and Ruth - hot or not? This poll is closed. |
|||
| The greatest thing since the turbine engine | ![]() ![]() |
36 | 90.00% |
| Old, decrepit and just wrong | ![]() ![]() |
4 | 10.00% |
| Total | 40 votes | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
[spoilers] Harry and Ruth Strike Back
|
|
03-08-2010, 04:25 PM
Post: #288
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [spoilers] Harry and Ruth Strike Back
(03-08-2010 04:11 PM)A Cousin Wrote: Wow! This is long. Hope you are still reading.... You do put forward a good argument A Cousin. I know I have already had my ten cents worth so I won't bang on too much. I know I am pretty much on my own going for 2003 but my final thought is, if it was as late as 2005, when Harry already had feelings for Ruth, strong feelings, why would he take her to the most dangerous place in the world at that time i.e. Baghdad?
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)
Search
Member List
Help




I know I have already had my ten cents worth so I won't bang on too much. I know I am pretty much on my own going for 2003 but my final thought is, if it was as late as 2005, when Harry already had feelings for Ruth, strong feelings, why would he take her to the most dangerous place in the world at that time i.e. Baghdad?
