Evolution of Spooks.

[A Cousin]

(28-04-2011 07:03 PM)HarryPearceSpy Wrote:  Question for you and A Cousin- Do you think Andrew Woodhead was influenced by the rise of 24 and how it has a lot of action?

No - I think he is too good at what he does for that. I just think they kept raising the stakes. In a programme where the stakes started so very high, eventually it just goes there. Maybe they were influenced by the slickness of American TV overall, but they have always fought against comparisons to 24. Rightly so, IMO.

---

(29-04-2011 06:16 PM)loladom Wrote:  In seasons 1-5 there was a focus on the action, the espionage, the intelligence gathering and the PEOPLE behind that. Now, especially in S9, that is completely missing. We learned little about Beth and zero about Demitri.

Agreed. I don't buy, at all, what a couple of the current writers said about not being able to present reasonably developed secondary characters complete with back-story and established personality before you cast the actors. A character can certainly evolve from there and all the Spooks characters have. It doesn't take much; a beat here and french scene there is all it takes. Look how well they developed Malcolm with small scenes throughout his time?

(29-04-2011 06:16 PM)loladom Wrote:  I also think they've lost the intelligence of Harry and Ruth with the new writers and reference to philosophers and literature.

Hmmm.... Come to think of it. I would like to see that return. I just kind of assumed they were dropping quotes all over the place but it was all just going over my head (as usual).