Search
Member List
Help
|
[spoilers] Richard Armitage
|
|
29-01-2010, 06:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 29-01-2010 06:32 PM by JHyde.)
Post: #91
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Richard Armitage
Oh that's good, I won't spell it out.
My sister reckons he does blink a lot. So maybe he could be Sir Guy BlinksALot. ![[Image: colleagues.png]](http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae211/TygerMag/spooks/colleagues.png) Many thanks to Tyger for a terrific signature |
|||
|
|
29-01-2010, 06:44 PM
Post: #92
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Richard Armitage
![[Image: s9-sig.jpg]](http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae211/TygerMag/spooks/Lucas/s9-sig.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|
02-02-2010, 09:53 AM
Post: #93
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Richard Armitage
Just had a sly look at my signed photo again and the return postmark is Leicester.....sweet
![[Image: kirmosig.png]](http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae211/TygerMag/spooks/kirmosig.png)
|
|||
|
|
|
02-02-2010, 01:54 PM
Post: #94
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Richard Armitage
I never noticed the blinking in Spooks (though I haven't watched S7 dvd lately) but have been watching Robin Hood & found it really irritating!
Thanks for the info on the photo, may have to send off for one... 
![[Image: licence2thrill.png]](http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae211/TygerMag/spooks/licence2thrill.png) Loving my new signature! |
|||
|
|
|
02-02-2010, 02:17 PM
Post: #95
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Richard Armitage
RA couldn't irritate me if he tried.....actually it would irritate me if he ever acted in something and always kept his clothes on......... :o)
|
|||
|
|
|
02-02-2010, 04:17 PM
Post: #96
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Richard Armitage
oooh no, we don't like him so much with ALL of his clothes on.....
Lucas North: Your situation is more precarious than you realize, Connie, so stop pressing buttons and give us something. Connie James: Threats don't work with a person who has nothing to lose. Lucas North: Oh, you're too ingenious to think that I'm threatening you. I'm offering you a simple choice: help us or don't. I'll leave you to compute the implication. 
|
|||
|
|
|
02-02-2010, 04:51 PM
Post: #97
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Richard Armitage
At least we know he gets his kit off in Strike Back........
|
|||
|
|
|
02-02-2010, 04:53 PM
Post: #98
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Richard Armitage
Oh Yes, I can hardly wait...... An April full of RA and skin on show......
Lucas North: Your situation is more precarious than you realize, Connie, so stop pressing buttons and give us something. Connie James: Threats don't work with a person who has nothing to lose. Lucas North: Oh, you're too ingenious to think that I'm threatening you. I'm offering you a simple choice: help us or don't. I'll leave you to compute the implication.
|
|||
|
|
|
02-02-2010, 06:17 PM
Post: #99
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Richard Armitage
At first I saw Richard in "North and South" - it was one movie with him in the russian translation.
 Then I saw "Robin Hood" - only 2 series, I don't watch 3 series because I can't see how Guy of Gisborn is suffering. Then was "Moving on". And now I'm watching "spooks" 
|
|||
|
|
|
02-02-2010, 06:25 PM
Post: #100
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Richard Armitage
(02-02-2010 06:17 PM)murarik Wrote: I don't watch 3 series because I can't see how Guy of Gisborn is suffering. but few do suffering as brilliantly as RA.. I like guilt-ridden and grief-stricken Guy even better than tall, dark, and evil Guy.. go on, give tortured Guy a try
|
|||
|
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
